Completing the Annual Performance Evaluation process for administrative staff. This guide outlines the process both as a supervisor and employee. The University of Wyoming Service Desk is here to help ...

Companies work hard to attract the right people, and they work equally hard to support those employees’ development and growth within the company. Sometimes employees do not or cannot perform at the ...

For successful organizations, feedback shouldn’t be an annual formality. Instead, continuous feedback should be the driving force behind engagement, growth, and success. Why do we do it this way?

The Fast Company Executive Board is a private, fee-based network of influential leaders, experts, executives, and entrepreneurs who share their insights with our audience. BY Chalmers Brown Every ...

Organizations typically conduct performance reviews at least once a year, and rare is the individual who truly enjoys performance reviews. Most managers find it unpleasant to deliver negative feedback ...

While the U.S. economy continues to add jobs, fewer of them are corporate. In this climate, when employees leave, their roles are often not backfilled. Retaining the team you have is more important ...

Annual and bi-annual performance reviews have been considered ineffective at improving employee performance. According to Gallup, “only 14% of employees agree that their performance reviews inspire ...

According to a survey of more than 65,000 employees, those who received feedback on their strengths had a turnover rate that was nearly 15% lower than those who didn’t receive feedback. Further, 9 out ...

Now is a good time to re-evaluate your company’s employee evaluation process in light of the prevalence of remote work and a U.S. Supreme Court decision lowering the requirements for employees to ...

The changes to the Meta performance review system bring new rewards for top performers, while also increasing the frequency ...

Under Checkpoint, Meta shifts to two performance cycles per year (mid-year and year-end) with a consistent rating scale.